Showing posts with label Horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Horror. Show all posts

April 16, 2022

The Sadness

The Sadness is the most violent horror film you'll see this year. It's probably the most violent horror film you'll watch this decade...nah, you know what, scratch that, it' might be the most violent horror film you'll ever see. Well unless you frequent the darker sides of the internet but that's a strange place for stranger people so let's just say The Sadness will freak you out.

There's something viral the air in Taipei, the capital of Taiwan and it's making people freak out. Not in an exasperated "FUCK IT ANYWAY!" kind of way but more dunk a person's head in boiling oil and then rip the melting flesh off their face kind of way. Jim (Berant Zhu) sees this happen up close and personal in his local cafe and his day is only going to get worse from there. Wholesale butchery is turning his city into a bloodstained warzone and no one knows why and all Jim can do is think about Kat (Regina Lei), his other half using the city subway to get to work. What she sees happen on a train carriage is enough to turn anyone catatonic for life but Kat is a hardy lady and now their mission is to fight their way across urban hell to reunite before the sadness catches up to them.

Jesus christ. JESUS CHRIST. That's all you'll be saying for the first hour of this topical gorefest. It's a vicious, insane assault on the senses that barely gives you time to catch your breath in between it's bouts of hideous bloodletting. It starts off fun in an "oh fuck" kind of way but eventually it's violence just becomes numbing and repetitive and by the gouged out eye socket rape scene (yeah you sadly read that right) you just want it to be over and done with and when the end does come it feels like Canadian writer/director Rob Jabbaz just flat out ran out of ideas letting it finish on a whimper instead of a roar. It's disappointing because that first and second act is just nonstop. We get to know and like Jim and Kat for a wee while until the plot separates them and then it's just chaos, lovingly designed gore setpieces hitting one after the other in a manner that will either have you running for the door or laughing your arse off.

An early gorefree moment sets the agenda though. Kat, reading in a train carriage, alone but surrounded by other commuters. An older man sits next to her and attempts conversation. It's innocent at first but imperceptibly turns sinister and then sickening. Jabbaz's message is clear, humanity can't help itself, even without that disease ripping the city apart above ground we're prey to our baser instincts and when the sadness does hit it just lets loose what we really want to do. In sanguis veritas if you will. It might be a cynical worldview but it's not far off the mark and it's compounded later on by the actions of a security guard that will have you hissing at the screen. But in films like this everyone gets what's coming to them and if it's blood and guts you want, you'll get all you'll ever need here.

With it's clearly, carefully shot and well choreographed action it's obvious Jabbaz has talent. His horror chops are strong too with some big nods to the likes of Irreversible and A Serbian Movie and Garth's Ennis's long running comic series Crossed. Like that comic The Sadness does at times go beyond the pale into a place that's flat out offensive and it's those couple of moments alongside a weak ending that may well stop this from becoming a horror favourite in years to come. 

The Sadness will be streaming on Shudder soon.

March 30, 2022

Video Nasty Rewatch part 43 - Contamination

Deadly egg yolk. That's the big bad of Luigi Cozzi's Contamination, the 4th film of the unprosecuted 33 films on the DPP video nasty list. Egg yolk that turns lethal when it gets hot. Yup. 

One of the joys of revisiting the nasties is realising some of the films you wrote off as crap as a younger viewer have aged quite well. Cannibal Man for example, watching it with hindsight and some knowledge of the Franco regime era that Spanish film was created in it becomes a deeper, richer experience. Same with the likes of Expose and The Werewolf And The Yeti. Sadly Contamination goes the other way. I'd remembered it as a fun bit of gory sci-fi with a smattering of action thrown in. It's sci-fi and it's mildly gory but jesus christ there's nothing fun about it. It's an intensely dull experience with a middle section that would test the resolve of a saint. Oh and it's special effects suck. Just look.

Ian McCulloch, star of the arguably the best nasty of them all, Zombie Flesh Eaters plays the woman clattering hero (yup, seriously, the fucking 80's) Commander Hubbard, an ex astronaut who's experiences on Mars scarred him psychologically and left him with a bottle of whiskey a day habit. He's been called back into action when a ship full of alien eggs is found in New York Harbour. These aren't chocolate or used for omelettes though, when they get hot they burst and release toxins that cause anyone in the vicinity to violently explode, spraying their innards all around. Enter army Colonel Stella Holmes, the scientist who's linked the eggs to Hubbards mission to Mars and now they're both heading to Colombia to follow a clue before someone uses these eggs for nefarious purposes.

Don't watch this one if you want a story that makes sense or you want a bit of excitement because you'll find neither here. The film's one gore effect is funny the first time it happens but after the 7th or 8th go around you'd rather your own stomach graphically popped rather than watch anymore of this. It's painful, an amazing example of how long 90 minutes can be made feel when you don't try at all and director Luigi Cozzi is definitely on autopilot here with a cheap and not cheerful rip off of Ridley Scott's Alien.....well not a rip off but more of an influenced by........well no, he stole the egg idea and the popping guts stuff anyway but left that film's character development and tension on the ground behind him. That middle section where our lead characters head to Colombia is the very definition of filler and doesn't hide the fact.

The only reason anyone remembers this film is it's nasty status. It got it's first release in 1982 minus 2 minutes and 40 seconds of blood and guts. Like the eggs did to their victims the BBFC eviscerated the film, removing everything objectionable from it. The below details are shamelessly stolen from Melonfarmers.

  • 13 seconds cut from opening sequence showing a dead man's mutilated and decomposing body in a cupboard.
  • 73 seconds cut from opening sequence showing several men graphically exploding after tampering with alien pods. Footage includes facial explosions and several scientists exploding at the gut in lingering slow-motion.
  • 19 seconds cut from warehouse sequence showing criminals exploding at the gut after unwisely standing amongst alien pods.
  • 2 seconds cut from warehouse sequence in which remains of freshly-exploded men are shown.
  • 9 seconds cut from climax, in which man's head is devoured by queen alien.
  • 11 seconds cut from climax showing a scientist exploding at the gut after being shot by Ian McCulloch.
  • 33 seconds cut from climax showing chief villain's chest exploding in slow-motion viscera-launch spectacle.

This tame, family friendly version happily existed on VHS until the video nasty scare of 1983 kicked off and somehow it got swallowed up in the whole ordeal, no doubt because it came from a director with an Italian name and as Ruggero Deodato, Dario Argento, Umberto Lenzi. Lucio Fulci, Antonio Margheriti and Joe D'Amato knew, the BBFC looked harshly on Italian horror. It stayed on the list until 1985 when an unsuccessful prosecution saw it removed. How could a film containing no violence be found obscene ffs!? The damage was done though. The film was now infamous. In 2004 it got a fully uncut release on DVD and horror fans could finally be disappointed by it legally. It's 15 certificate said it all, no horror and shite effects. 

Did it deserve it's nasty status? Ha!

Is it worth a watch? HA!

What's next? Dead And Buried is next. A really good horror film. Well I remember it being really good. But I also remembered Contamination being fun. Hmmmm.

Previous Nasties

The Boogeyman

The Beyond

Video Nasties part 2 

Zombie Flesh Eaters

Werewolf And The Yeti, The

Tenebrae

SS Experiment Camp

Snuff

Night Of The Demon

Night Of The Bloody Apes

Nightmares In A Damaged Brain

Mardi Gras Massacre

Madhouse

Love Camp 7

Last House On The Left

Island Of Death

I Spit On Your Grave

House On The Edge Of The Park, The

House By The Cemetary,The

Gestapo's Last Orgy

Forest Of Fear

Flesh For Frankenstein

Fight For Your Life

Faces Of Death

Expose

Evilspeak

Driller Killer

Don't Go In The Woods

Devil Hunter

Cannibal Man

Cannibal Holocaust

Cannibal Ferox

Cannibal Apocalypse

Burning, The

Bloody Moon

Blood Rites

Blood Feast

Beast In Heat, The

Bay Of Blood

Axe & Anthropophagus

Absurd

Video Nasties - Time For A Rewatch

March 19, 2022

X

A new Ti West film is always a cause for celebration. He's a horror director who loves the genre, who isn't afraid to stir the pot a bit. His new film X doesn't reinvent the slasher movie wheel but it has fun fucking with the formula and goddamn if the man isn't afraid of the red stuff. X is a film that earns it's 18 certificate and wears it with pride. In an age of tame that always feels refreshing. Let the head squashing commence.

Texas. The 70's. A woman runs screaming through a field from a rural farmhouse. The Texas Chain Saw Massacre vibes are undeniable. Leatherface isn't inside though. No, there's something far weirder than any bloke with a power tool. There's someone who wants to be loved and frustration can be a terrible thing, especially when temptation abounds. The gang have arrived at a farmhouse outside of Houston and they've pornography on their mind. The performers are Pearl (Mia Goth), Jackson (Kid Cudi) and Bobby Lynne (Britanny Snow). The crew are Lorraine (Jenna Ortega) and RJ (Owen Campbell) and directing the action is Wayne (Martin Henderson). RJ and Wayne have high hopes for their production, RJ's are artistic and Wayne's are financial. Texas though....morality's a strange thing in the hinterland, sex is the root of all evil but violence, well violence is just a way of life.

In the state of Texas a law exists called the Castle doctrine which means using force is reasonable and justified when another person: unlawfully or with force enters or attempts to enter your habitation, vehicle, or work-place. The back guys of X have technically done no wrong, especially when one of the good guys has encroached on them without permission and yeah Tobe Hooper riffed on this lawful madness back in 1974 with TCM but Ti West leaves the primal, terrifying side of horror to him and goes down a more enjoyable path . There's a lot of fun here before the blood starts to spill and even after it's rusty essence fills the air he still finds way to make you grin at the unfolding carnage. Sometimes you can guess how someone will bite the dust; one nature assisted death is telegraphed early in a beautiful overhead shot, but when it happens you'll still leap out of your chair. 

Other times you won't see it coming at all because of that aforementioned formula fucking. Slasher films can often be accused of slavishly sticking to genre rules but all it takes is a little spin here and there to turn a story towards unpredictable. X does has it eyerolling moments when a character wanders off into the night by themselves towards certain death but it shakes things up enough to stand out in a packed field. It's imagery will stick in your mind too, often not in a nice way. A stunning birdseye view of aquatic danger, a view that's mirrored in a nightmarish escape from a bedroom late in the movie, a reverse zoom shot of a woman on a pier that feels so authentically 70's that you'll forget you're watching a film made in 2021 and fatal encounter by the lights of a car that goes full Dario Argento when blood splashes across a headlight. 


There's substance behind the style too, a story set in the tail end of the era of free love in a country still haunted by it's involvement in the Vietnamese war, where sex feels wrong but violence is the answer. Our protagonists just want to have a good time but in the eyes of others they're sinners. Even amongst their own ranks there's dissent and posturing with West using one scene where a crew member decides to join in the onscreen fun as an excuse to poke fun at male hypocrisy when it comes to matters of the flesh. X's well crafted cast has fun here with Britanny Snow and Kid Cudi being the stand outs as the startlingly confident main performers but it's Mia Goth's strong, believable turn as Pearl who gives the film it's impetus. It's very late in the day when we find out why she is the way she is and mere moments later the whole thing finishes with a kiss off line that will ensure you leave the cinema laughing.

X is showing in cinemas now. It's great fun if you can handle it.


March 08, 2022

Video nasty rewatch part 42 - Cannibal Terror

We can stop now. We've found it. The nadir of video nasty cinema. The low point is Cannibal Terror, a film lobbed onto the Video nasty list in 1983 and binned in 1985. You'd feel bad for the kids renting this out back in the day, thinking they were on for a traumatic thrill ride Ã  la Cannibal Holocaust and ending up with a sub A-Team shitfest that looks like it was filmed in the scrub out behind someone's house and that's interminably padded out with footage from other films and gore scenes that consist of people eating sausages covered in ketchup to make them look like intestines.

Cannibal Terror was directed by a Frenchman named Alain Deruelle who made it around the same time and in the same place as the infamous Jess Franco was directing his own take on Cannibal cinema. Both share a lot of sets, some stock jungle footage and some of the same actors portraying the cannibals but .....and I can't quite believe I'm saying this..... this ain't a patch on a Franco film. He could pace a story, he could frame a shot, he could coax a somewhat believe performance from an actor. None of that kind of skill is present here. It's up there with the worst films you'll ever see. And yet, being associated with that infamous list has given it a lease of life far, far beyond anyone could have ever expected. 

It's story is a very simple one. A child is kidnapped by two men and a woman to be held ransom for money. The kidnappers are warned by their driver they're in cannibal territory but the woman wonders off by herself anyway and gets munched in a messy moment that no doubt caught the eye of the BBFC snippers in London's Soho Square. The kidnappers then decide to into the jungle with the child anyway to escape the rescue party coming for her. Of course they're captured and eaten but the child is rescued and we get an improbable happy ending. 

It's the sheer ineptitude with which it's all carried out though. The scrubland of Alicante in southern Spain is a stand in for the lush tropical rainforests of South America. The cannibals are played by European actors in dark makeup or in some cases no make up at all, who can't help but look into the camera each time it passes them. You'll have great fun spotting the disco tattoo fella, or the chap with the giant muttonchop sideburns but best of all are the cannibals wearing trainers....in a supposedly remote jungle village, with manicured grass and cars driving by in the distance. There's no point in even mentioning the performances because they're just non existent. No direction, no effort, no nothing. The other cannibal films on the list had subtext at least, a message of sorts, Cannibal Terror has nada, it's a cash in on those others.

It's been rumoured over the years that the only reason this ended up as a video nasty was it's title and it's not too improbable a thing to happen. During the police raids of the early 80's mix ups regularly occured with war classics like Apocalypse Now being mistaken for Cannibal Apocalypse and Sam Fuller's WW2 drama The Big Red One getting seized for having an obscene sounding name (this genuinely happened). Anyone thinking it comes near the intensity of Ruggero Deodato's Cannibal Holocaust or Umberto Lenzi's Cannibal Ferox is in for a drop though. The film does contain elements that could cause it trouble with film classifiers but it's all so shoddily mounted it's hard to imagine anyone being offended by any of it. As mentioned before....sausages. Fucking sausages. It was no surprise when it was found to be unprosecutable and therefore dropped from the obscenity list.

Did Cannibal Terror deserve it's place on the video nasty list? LoL no.

Is it worth a watch? Lol no.

Up next - Luigi Cozzi's Contamination. This one kinda rocks.

Previous nasties

The Boogeyman

The Beyond

Video Nasties part 2 

Zombie Flesh Eaters

Werewolf And The Yeti, The

Tenebrae

SS Experiment Camp

Snuff

Night Of The Demon

Night Of The Bloody Apes

Nightmares In A Damaged Brain

Mardi Gras Massacre

Madhouse

Love Camp 7

Last House On The Left

Island Of Death

I Spit On Your Grave

House On The Edge Of The Park, The

House By The Cemetary,The

Gestapo's Last Orgy

Forest Of Fear

Flesh For Frankenstein

Fight For Your Life

Faces Of Death

Expose

Evilspeak

Driller Killer

Don't Go In The Woods

Devil Hunter

Cannibal Man

Cannibal Holocaust

Cannibal Ferox

Cannibal Apocalypse

Burning, The

Bloody Moon

Blood Rites

Blood Feast

Beast In Heat, The

Bay Of Blood

Axe & Anthropophagus

Absurd

Video Nasties - Time For A Rewatch


March 05, 2022

The Batman

The Batman cuts to the chase. There's no need for an origin story here. We all know what happened to Bruce Wayne to turn him into the Caped Crusader, Gotham City's saviour, the World's Greatest Detective. There's no need to see him traumatised once again by the murder of his parents Thomas and Martha after we've already seen them gunned down in four other films by Jack Napier/Joe Chill/randomers. Despite that being skipped over The Batman still manages to be almost 3 hours long. There's no justification for that at all. It's a fine film but that midsection....it robs the film of a lot.

We open on what we think is going to be that origin all over again but it's a trick and soon one of Gotham's political elite is wiped out. The city is in shock and Lieutenant Gordon (Jeffrey Wright) wastes no time in bringing the Batman (Robert Pattinson) into the investigation, a move that alienates the cops of the city who see him as a vigilante freak. Batman dives straight into the city's dark underbelly and comes into contact with The Penguin (Colin Farrell), a scarred killer who controls a mafia owned nightclub frequented by the hypocrites who claim to be on the side of good and Selina Kyle (Zoë Kravitz), a waitress who knows more than she's letting on. As more and more well known faces die horribly in cruel Saw/Se7en-esque ways Batman finds himself drawn closer and closer to the man committing the atrocities, a masked psychopath called The Riddler (Paul Dano).

It's the first scrap that settles your nerves about this one. A confrontation in a dark subway that's just brutally efficient. Christopher Nolan's confusingly shot action isn't anywhere to be seen here, just bang, biff, whollop and done. Batman takes no shit from anyone and Robert Pattinson looks convincing taking care of business. Out of costume as Bruce Wayne he's a mopey emo kid and a million miles away from the Christian Bale/Ben Affleck sleek macho playboy version but it's a depiction that makes sense. He's traumatised by his past and he's made it his present. There's instant chemistry with Selina Kyle, another damaged soul with a shitty past, they sense it in each other and just click. Then she disappears for a whole chunk of the movie and it suffers as a result, especially in the scenes where Bruce and his butler Alfred (Andy Serkis) delve back into Bruce's past for a while. We all thought we'd get away from Thomas and Martha right? Wrong. A bedside scene (along with other drawn out and unnecessary moments) between the pair threatens to kill the film's momentum dead and it's a nuisance after all the good will built up in that opening hour.

Director Matt Reeve's take on Gotham is an effective one, skewing more towards the skanky, slimy urban landscape of Tim Burton's films and Batman Begins than the shiny metropolis of more recent films. It's a dangerous place populated with filth, wracked by random violence perpetrated by young men with nothing better to do. One of these young men is The Riddler, a psychopath not far removed from the "incel" shooters making America such a scary place to live in the 21st century. Using social media he's created a following of like minded individuals and it's his plan kicking into action that drags the film out of the mid section doldrums and gives us a topical ending to get our teeth into. He ain't the only bad guy roaming the streets though. Nope, this is a Batman film, there's always someone else knocking around and it's here that an unrecognisable Colin Farrell nearly steals the film for himself. His take on Oswald Cobblepot aka The Penguin leans away from the freakshow aspects of the character and more towards his vicious side, a gangland enforcer and unrepentant criminal who'll still make you laugh. He might look like a side of beef someone took a blade to but Farrell's charm and sense of humour can't help but shine through the impressive makeup. It's just a pity he's not in it for longer. More Colin would have made that dull middle hour a lot more bearable.

The Batman isn't without it's (big) fault's but it's the best take on the comic book since 2008's The Dark Knight. Despite all it's murkiness it's a fantastic looking movie (that tunnel scrap illuminated by gunfire is a PEACH), R-Pattz looks believable in and out of the costume and the energy between him and Zoë Kravitz will have you looking forward to her inevitable return in the inevitable sequel. Speaking of sequels, what until you see who tu........nah, let's leave that one for you to find out yourself.

The Batman is in cinemas now everywhere.

February 18, 2022

Texas Chainsaw Massacre

The Texas Chain Saw Massacre. A title so potent it's been reused and rejigged eight times since 1974 but not a single sequel, prequel or reboot has come close to matching the raw, nerve jangling ferocity of the original. The 2022 sequel ignores the seven films before it, bringing things back to basics and also bringing back Sally Hardesty, the lone survivor of 1974, last seen (yeah she was in a crap sequel but that doesn't matter now) hysterically laughing and shrieking while soaked in blood and escaping Leatherface in the back of a pick up truck. Seeing her coming back brings to mind the two recent and awful Halloween soft reboots. It's also so bad it makes those two films look pretty good.

Do you remember the first time you saw The Shining? Dick Halloran making his way across America to save the day and then having absolutely no impact at all. That's the way you'll feel when Sally turns up, locked and loaded, to save a bus full of *shudder* social media influencers from a gory evisceration at the business end of a chainsaw.  Having the excellent Irish actor Olwen Fouéré playing the part has you hoping for something special but she's just another one of many wasted opportunities on display. It's a genuinely bad film that displays all the hallmarks of a troubled production (it's original directors were fired during production, never a good sign) and who's only saving graces are the return of John Larroquette for an opening bit of narration, just like he did in the original (and in the 2003 & 2006 version) and a mercifully short running time of 82 minutes, 73 minus the drawn out end credits. It's never a good sign when a film this short has you wondering when it will finish. 

The town of Harlow, Texas died a long time ago but a pair of *shudder* entrepreneurs have bought it up to bring it back to life and have brought a bus full of instagrammers and snapchatters with them to buy up the properties in an attempt to create a new way of life, away from the trouble and strife of big city life. Despite bank foreclosures some townsfolk still exist there and when one of them dies it stirs another to start killing again. You can probably guess who.

Insta folk being sliced and diced does sound fun doesn't it and if you've seen the trailer you'll know what's coming but what will surprise you is how dull and inert the big moment feels despite all the limbs and intestines flying. Director David Blue Garcia is no Tobe Hooper and fails at the first horror film hurdle. To scare your audience you have to make them give a damn about the characters and you won't be doing that here. The trailer also magnifies just how influenced by the recent Halloween reboots this whole thing is as mentioned earlier. Sequels being flat out ignored, the final girl now a final elderly woman, tooling up and coming for revenge. At least those had the novelty of the original star coming back but here Marilyn Burns's passing in 2014 forced a recasting and having a new actor in the part robs it of it's power. None of the rest of the cast makes any impact either apart from Elsie Fisher (So good in Eighth Grade) as Lila, the sister of one of the town buyers and Moe Dunford as Richter, a suspect town local. He's having fun at least and (SPOILER) goes out in a moment of gore that would have gotten this film banned had it been released not so long ago.

If you're a horror fan who's only here for the violence you might glean some enjoyment from this. The 1974 film, despite being banned in numerous countries spilled barely a drop of blood onscreen and 48 years later the 9th film in the franchise has decide to take a different approach, spraying the town red with it's impalements, decapitations and amputations. It truly lives up to it's title but it doesn't come close to even licking the original film's boots. You won't be scared by it and you won't care about anyone in it. It's background noise at best.

Now streaming on Netflix.

February 13, 2022

Video Nasty Rewatch part 41 - The Boogeyman

The 41st film on the video nasty list feels like an amalgamation of Halloween, The Amityville Horror and The Exorcist. It's not a patch on any of them but it does have a scene where someone is brutally murdered by a kiss. That has got to count for something. Right? RIGHT???

Kids with weapons. Always a BBFC bugbear. Sadomasochistic sex? Another BBFC hot button issue. The Boogeyman begins with a child discovering his mother and her fella indulging in a spot of slap and tickle so he buries a knife in the fella's back. From the off The Boogeyman was going to be in trouble. Sex and violence combined and a child with a blade in the mix too? Yeesh. The murder kicks the story into gear. A murder in front of a mirror that the dead man's tormented soul gets trapped in. How? Who knows? Who cares? The murder has affected the boy and he grows up to be a troubled man living and working on his sister's farm. A letter from their dying mother dredges up old memories and a trip back to the murder house unleashes long withheld emotion and destruction that sees the mirror smashed to smithereens. Now there's an evil presence on the loose and revenge is it's only mission. It's definition of revenge is elastic though so basically everyone in the film is in trouble. Especially the random groups of teenagers knocking around because early 80's horror films loved to slice and dice them.

It sounds poxy but the presence of a real director does this one a lot of favours. Ulli Lommel started directing in the New German Cinema movement of the early 70's alongside Rainer Werner Fassbinder before moving to New York late in the decade where he collaborated with no other than Andy Warhol. The Boogeyman was his third American film and while the majority of the film is really no different to the ten a penny slashers that riddled the early 80's there's an ability to create tension and scares in daytime settings that other film makers nearly always fail to do or just flat out avoid. There's a Freudian undertone in the opening scenes that gives it a rare intelligence and there's a couple of nice visual flourishes here too, usually when someone is about to violently bite the dust and the spirit makes its presence known through twinkling lights in the distance or a reflection dancing on a wall between a victim. It's subtle and better than a crappy ghostly effect.

It's the only subtle thing here though. Every other horror trope is trotted out. Dopes heading off into the unknown by themselves, oversexed teens finding remote locations to canoodle and then die. The house our leads live in SCREAMS haunted house. People with special needs are the source of special powers. If someone good looking dies it's usually in the nude. You know all the usual cliches that slasher films deal in. Adding a splash of the supernatural into the mix keeps the death scenes interesting though. The knives and machetes you'd expect are kept to a minimum and instead we get scissors and pitchforks. Haha! Yes it's stabbing implements as always but this time it's not a madman welding them and when things are ghostly all logic flies out the window.

A supernatural being forces a nude woman to stab herself in the throat with a scissors. She dies in the bathtub with her boobs bloodied and on display. Yet another BBFC nono. That and the opening scenes were definitely going to ring bells in the BBFC's Soho Square offices. Similar scenes have been cut from the films of Brian De Palma in the past among others. The video version of this that was released in 1981 has this scene and others shortened and the distributors, the infamous VIPCO who also released Driller Killer and Zombie Flesh Eaters, thought all was well until the film was targeted in the video nasty scare of 1983. Unlike those this one wasn't successfully prosecuted for obscenity and was removed from the video nasty list in 1985. It's place on the director of public prosecutions list made it instantly collectible for horror fans and it was sought after for years until VIPCO re-released it in 1992. The cuts stayed in place until 2000 though when fans could legally see Ulli Lommel's preferred version.

Did it deserve a place on the list? Through modern eyes no but certain aspects of it were always going to be trouble.

Is it worth a watch? Yup. It's not bad at all.

Previous Nasties

The Beyond

Video Nasties part 2 

Zombie Flesh Eaters

Werewolf And The Yeti, The

Tenebrae

SS Experiment Camp

Snuff

Night Of The Demon

Night Of The Bloody Apes

Nightmares In A Damaged Brain

Mardi Gras Massacre

Madhouse

Love Camp 7

Last House On The Left

Island Of Death

I Spit On Your Grave

House On The Edge Of The Park, The

House By The Cemetary,The

Gestapo's Last Orgy

Forest Of Fear

Flesh For Frankenstein

Fight For Your Life

Faces Of Death

Expose

Evilspeak

Driller Killer

Don't Go In The Woods

Devil Hunter

Cannibal Man

Cannibal Holocaust

Cannibal Ferox

Cannibal Apocalypse

Burning, The

Bloody Moon

Blood Rites

Blood Feast

Beast In Heat, The

Bay Of Blood

Axe & Anthropophagus

Absurd

Video Nasties - Time For A Rewatch

January 26, 2022

Video Nasty Rewatch part 40 - The Beyond

72 films were placed on the infamous video nasty list by the UK director of public prosecutions between 1983 and 1985 but only 39 of them were actually prosecuted for obscenity. The Beyond is the first of the unprosecuted 33 and it's probably the best of the bunch. Hmmm. Well, top 3 anyway. Lucio Fulci's most famous film is always going to be (what else) Zombie Flesh Eaters but The Beyond is his masterpiece. His beautiful, nonsensical masterpiece.

Also know as L'Aldila and 7 Doors Of Death, it wasn't well received during it's general release in 1981 but it's reputation grows yearly, especially amongst genre fans who can look past the ropey acting and dubbing and see the chaotic madness at it's heart, it's surreal evocation of Deep South life and an ending that is absolutely unforgiving and truly horrific. In places it veers close to full on arthouse horror but it's brutal set-pieces keep the pretension at bay. Set-pieces that put the film in the BBFC's crosshairs but more on that later.

Liz has come from New York to New Orleans after inheriting an old hotel and her plan is to renovate it and reopen it but from the start it's plagued with violence and death. A painter has a fatal fall from scaffolding after seeing something horrifying through a window and a plumber has his eyes gouged out (in close up of course) while investigating a basement leak. The bell for room 36 keeps ringing even though it's unoccupied while a blind woman in town tells Lisa some foreboding truths about the place she wants to make her future. 56 years in the past something hideous (shown in close up of course) happened in the basement and now the hotel is forever cursed. 

Gore aside Lucio Fulci was a hell of a dab hand at creating atmosphere and that combined with Goblin's creepy as hell score made even the cut to ribbons version of The Beyond a fan fave. Vast swathes of the film make no sense but you won't care when it's this unsettling and visually interesting. Fulci and his collaborator's admitted themselves that the film originated from a handful of death scenes Fulci had thought up of which they then had to write a story around to connect them up. For example late in the film Liz goes to visit a local architect to look at the plans of the hotel and when she leaves his building he has a tumble and paralyses himself and is slowly attacked by an army of tarantulas. For an arachnophobe it's a traumatic watch but it's an undeniably unique scene as his face is torn asunder (in close up once again). There's no point in questioning it. You just have to go with the flow. And maybe wonder about the psychology of a director obsessed with destroying eyeballs. Tarantulas do it, fingers, nails, glimpsing evil does it. It's the stuff of college theses. 

It's this ocular carnage that got The Beyond thrown right into the middle of the video nasties scare. Well that and Fulci's previous work. Throughout the 70's his work was extensively snipped and his latest was no different losing 1 minute and 39 seconds of the gooey stuff before it was deemed suitable for public consumption. A year later the cut version got released into the unregulated video market and it was of course a hit when fans of Fulci's previous films like Zombie Flesh Eaters and City of The Living Dead descended on it to enjoy it at home, even in it's censored form. In 1983 the cops swooped in and it landed on the nasty list only to be removed 2 years later after an unsuccessful obscenity prosecution. How the hell could it be considered obscene when every bit of gore was missing? The damage was done though and it's infamy was guaranteed. It took a further 17 years before it finally got an uncut, legal release in the UK and Ireland but in those years hardcore horror fans had turned it into a bootleg hit, sourcing uncut VHS copies in Amsterdam and selling piss poor copies all over the UK. 

Is it worth a watch? Yes. Gory moments aside there's imagery here you'll remember forever. Fulci may not have made a particularly coherent film but he made an astounding looking one.

Did it deserve it's notoriety? No, there's nothing here that would disturb a horror fan but that's looking at it from a 2022 perspective.

What's up next? The Boogeyman. A duffer. 

Previously

Video Nasties part 2 

Zombie Flesh Eaters

Werewolf And The Yeti, The

Tenebrae

SS Experiment Camp

Snuff

Night Of The Demon

Night Of The Bloody Apes

Nightmares In A Damaged Brain

Mardi Gras Massacre

Madhouse

Love Camp 7

Last House On The Left

Island Of Death

I Spit On Your Grave

House On The Edge Of The Park, The

House By The Cemetary,The

Gestapo's Last Orgy

Forest Of Fear

Flesh For Frankenstein

Fight For Your Life

Faces Of Death

Expose

Evilspeak

Driller Killer

Don't Go In The Woods

Devil Hunter

Cannibal Man

Cannibal Holocaust

Cannibal Ferox

Cannibal Apocalypse

Burning, The

Bloody Moon

Blood Rites

Blood Feast

Beast In Heat, The

Bay Of Blood

Axe & Anthropophagus

Absurd

Video Nasties - Time For A Rewatch